LIFamilies.com - Long Island, NY


RSS
Articles Business Directory Blog Real Estate Community Forum Shop My Family Contests

Log In Chat Index Search Rules Lingo Create Account

Quick navigation:   

How are you voting

Forum Opinion Poll
Clinton 124 37.58%
Trump 125 37.88%
Independent/3rd party 20 6.06%
Undecided but leaning Clinton 21 6.36%
Undecided but leaning Trump 25 7.58%
Undecided but leaning Indie/3rd party 15 4.55%
 

Clinton vs Trump

Posted By Message
Pages: << 4 5 6 [7]

BunnyWife
Insert Witty Comment Here

Member since 5/07

8274 total posts

Name:
BunnyWife

Re: Clinton vs Trump

Posted by SecretlyTTC14

Posted by ohbaby08

However, it sure isn't the 40% or whatever ridiculous number Trump claimed it actually is!



http://data.bls.gov/timeseries/LNS11300000

The labor force participation rate is 62.8% so that does make it just about 40% - it's not that much of an exaggeration.


I agree that gas prices have nothing to do with the president. I just saw someone posted that they are low and it seemed like the credit was going to Obama for that. So, I just wanted to mention that election years the price always drops. They will eventually skyrocket again.

Our economy is not in a good place and the stats are being misrepresented to give us a false sense of security.



The highest the labor participation rate we've ever had since 1950 was around 67%. You have to take into account that we have more retired people at this point in our history. People are living longer and are not working. It's not as black and white as the number would make it seem..

http://www.tradingeconomics.com/united-states/labor-force-participation-rate

Posted 5/12/16 11:28 AM
 

eroxgirl
My Loves

Member since 5/05

15697 total posts

Name:
Rebecca

Re: Clinton vs Trump

Posted by SecretlyTTC14

Posted by ohbaby08

However, it sure isn't the 40% or whatever ridiculous number Trump claimed it actually is!



http://data.bls.gov/timeseries/LNS11300000

The labor force participation rate is 62.8% so that does make it just about 40% - it's not that much of an exaggeration.


I agree that gas prices have nothing to do with the president. I just saw someone posted that they are low and it seemed like the credit was going to Obama for that. So, I just wanted to mention that election years the price always drops. They will eventually skyrocket again.

Our economy is not in a good place and the stats are being misrepresented to give us a false sense of security.



I don't know one way or the other, but is that number adjusted for people who are retiring? Baby Boomers are still the largest population group in this country, and they're retiring left and right. Both my parents retired this year, my uncle just a couple of years ago. There are a lot of factors, but the graph I'm looking at (the link you shared, but adjusted to 2000 instead of 2006) show that employment has been in decline for all 16 years of this century, but it looks like there's an uptick right now.

Another person in my family lost his job a few years back and never bothered to look for another one Chat Icon Didn't even put his resume together, because he too is a baby boomer and just assumed he wouldn't find a job. He'll vote for Trump also, while signing his family up for Obamacare and applying for government assistance...

Posted 5/12/16 11:28 AM
 

SecretlyTTC14
LIF Adult

Member since 12/13

1770 total posts

Name:
B

Re: Clinton vs Trump

Sure there are probably a ton of reasons for that number, but a lot of people have been laid off that can't find jobs and they are forced into early retirement when their unemployment runs out. I know a lot of retired people that would still work if they could find jobs. They weren't ready to retire but had no choice. The fact remains that the LFPR is the lowest it's been since 1977.

I'm not saying that Obama was a bad president or a good one. I believe they all try to do the best they can with what their given. I'm sure no one wants to intentionally go down in history as being a bad president.

People are always going to use the numbers to prove something (the president was great/the president was horrible) My only point is that the numbers ARE being misrepresented to make our economy seem A LOT better off then it really is.

Posted 5/12/16 11:54 AM
 

haveaquestion
LIF Adult

Member since 11/09

918 total posts

Name:

Re: Clinton vs Trump

Posted by SecretlyTTC14

Posted by ohbaby08

However, it sure isn't the 40% or whatever ridiculous number Trump claimed it actually is!



http://data.bls.gov/timeseries/LNS11300000

The labor force participation rate is 62.8% so that does make it just about 40% - it's not that much of an exaggeration.


I agree that gas prices have nothing to do with the president. I just saw someone posted that they are low and it seemed like the credit was going to Obama for that. So, I just wanted to mention that election years the price always drops. They will eventually skyrocket again.

Our economy is not in a good place and the stats are being misrepresented to give us a false sense of security.



I agree. You can't consider the unemployment number an indicator of strong economy. Once a person is no longer eligible to collect unemployment they are no longer considered unemployed. In some states it is shorter than 26 weeks. Also how many people are underemployed? There are people who were making 6 figures who are now working at minimum wage jobs just to try to pay the bills. Career opportunities for recent college graduates are limited as well.

Posted 5/12/16 12:08 PM
 

Meg1234
LIF Infant

Member since 9/12

159 total posts

Name:
M

Re: Clinton vs Trump

Posted by SecretlyTTC14

Sure there are probably a ton of reasons for that number, but a lot of people have been laid off that can't find jobs and they are forced into early retirement when their unemployment runs out. I know a lot of retired people that would still work if they could find jobs. They weren't ready to retire but had no choice. The fact remains that the LFPR is the lowest it's been since 1977.

I'm not saying that Obama was a bad president or a good one. I believe they all try to do the best they can with what their given. I'm sure no one wants to intentionally go down in history as being a bad president.

People are always going to use the numbers to prove something (the president was great/the president was horrible) My only point is that the numbers ARE being misrepresented to make our economy seem A LOT better off then it really is.




All true. I know many people exactly in this position.

Posted 5/12/16 12:51 PM
 
Pages: << 4 5 6 [7]
 

Potentially Related Topics:

Topic Posted By Started Replies Forum
herman caine/bill clinton/jfk....does a president or candidate's unfaithfulness impact your choice? LadyBugN2Buggies 12/1/11 16 Families Helping Families ™
XPOST Pets: Help Zootoo get Obama, McCain, and Clinton to stand up for pet shelters in America! Wendy 4/24/08 0 Families Helping Families ™
Touchy subject on Politics... do I dare do it? YES Obama vs Clinton smdl 1/3/08 68 Families Helping Families ™
Clinton vs. Bush.... MrsERod 8/18/06 16 Families Helping Families ™
Spinoff to CNN article... who performed better as a President, Clinton or GW Bush? SweetestOfPeas 5/13/06 31 Families Helping Families ™
Man Offered Bill Clinton 40 goats and 20 cows to marry Chelsea!! MrsJ 7/29/05 3 Families Helping Families ™
 
Quick navigation:   
Currently 333329 users on the LIFamilies.com Chat
New Businesses
1 More Rep
Carleton Hall of East Islip
J&A Building Services
LaraMae Health Coaching
Sonic Wellness
Julbaby Photography LLC
Ideal Uniforms
Teresa Geraghty Photography
Camelot Dream Homes
Long Island Wedding Boutique
MB Febus- Rodan & Fields
Camp Harbor
Market America-Shop.com
ACM Basement Waterproofing
Travel Tom

      Follow LIWeddings on Facebook

      Follow LIFamilies on Twitter
Long Island Bridal Shows