| Posted By |
Message |
| Pages: [1] 2 |
ChrisDee
My Girls
Member since 11/06 9543 total posts
Name:
Christine
|
Child's body found at Gilgo Beach
DH just showed me this(sorry if it was already posted)
http://www.metro.us/newyork/local/article/829253--gilgo-beach-murders-child-s-body-among-remains-found
So sad and scary
|
Posted 4/11/11 1:28 PM  |
| |
|
Long Island Weddings
Long Island's Largest Bridal Resource |
browneyes
All moms are working mothers!
Member since 8/08 4311 total posts
Name:
Super Mom
|
Re: Child's body found at Gilgo Beach
thats sad!! I wonder the story behing that one i cant see it being the same as the murder of the women, but you never know. ugh such a scary world we live in 
|
| Posted 4/11/11 1:50 PM |
| |
|
Cacarina
Two girls!
Member since 12/09 2971 total posts
Name:
Cari
|
Re: Child's body found at Gilgo Beach
Oh man! This is all so sad.
Sounds like there are two different serial killers using the same dumping grounds.
|
| Posted 4/11/11 1:51 PM |
| |
|
StaceyWill
It's a girl!!!
Member since 6/10 21536 total posts
Name:
Stacey
|
Re: Child's body found at Gilgo Beach
OMG-this whole situation is so sad
|
| Posted 4/11/11 1:52 PM |
| |
|
memi7206
LIF Adult
Member since 3/11 2355 total posts
Name:
Due Dec 29th!!!!!
|
Re: Child's body found at Gilgo Beach
I there is a news conference in like 5 minutes.....Ill wait and see and hope its the NYP just spinning the stoy, and falsely reporting.
|
| Posted 4/11/11 1:59 PM |
| |
|
Cacarina
Two girls!
Member since 12/09 2971 total posts
Name:
Cari
|
Re: Child's body found at Gilgo Beach
Posted by memi7206
I there is a news conference in like 5 minutes.....Ill wait and see and hope its the NYP just spinning the stoy, and falsely reporting.
Anyway I can watch the news conference on the computer?
|
| Posted 4/11/11 2:07 PM |
| |
|
Ayne11
Yep
Member since 1/09 18021 total posts
Name:
|
Re: Child's body found at Gilgo Beach
I just read on Newsday they were animal remains, and not that of an infant.
|
| Posted 4/11/11 2:15 PM |
| |
|
Aries14
Can't plan life...
Member since 8/08 2860 total posts
Name:
|
Re: Child's body found at Gilgo Beach
Posted by Ayne11
I just read on Newsday they were animal remains, and not that of an infant.
They just reported that they are finding animal bones as well and they have been sending some out to double check. They did not say that the infant remains were not indeed true.
Message edited 4/11/2011 2:22:43 PM.
|
| Posted 4/11/11 2:22 PM |
| |
|
browneyes
All moms are working mothers!
Member since 8/08 4311 total posts
Name:
Super Mom
|
Re: Child's body found at Gilgo Beach
Posted by Ayne11
I just read on Newsday they were animal remains, and not that of an infant.
oh thankgoodness!
|
| Posted 4/11/11 2:22 PM |
| |
|
ChrisDee
My Girls
Member since 11/06 9543 total posts
Name:
Christine
|
Re: Child's body found at Gilgo Beach
Posted by browneyes
Posted by Ayne11
I just read on Newsday they were animal remains, and not that of an infant.
oh thankgoodness!
I hope that I am wrong but I believe that they found animal bones in ADDITION to the child. The child was found days ago actually so I would think by now that they have figured out if it is a child or not. AGAIN, I pray that I am wrong.
|
| Posted 4/11/11 2:26 PM |
| |
|
Shorty
.
Member since 5/05 30390 total posts
Name:
really
|
Re: Child's body found at Gilgo Beach
Posted by ChrisDee
Posted by browneyes
Posted by Ayne11
I just read on Newsday they were animal remains, and not that of an infant.
oh thankgoodness!
I hope that I am wrong but I believe that they found animal bones in ADDITION to the child. The child was found days ago actually so I would think by now that they have figured out if it is a child or not. AGAIN, I pray that I am wrong.
right, the animal bones were found this morning.
|
| Posted 4/11/11 2:28 PM |
| |
|
Lina
My angel is finally here
Member since 5/10 2559 total posts
Name:
Lindsay
|
Re: Child's body found at Gilgo Beach
Posted by Ayne11
I just read on Newsday they were animal remains, and not that of an infant.
Thank God! Why would they even write something so horrible if its false information. How would they even mistake animal bones for human. I know the average person might not be able to tell but I'm sure if they had anyone there that knows something about human anatomy they would be able to tell the difference. Even if you only had parts of the skeleton you should still be able to tell. Just glad it wasn't a child, I am so sick of hearing about all of these bodies... we live in such a sick world!  praying there are no more bodies found
|
| Posted 4/11/11 2:29 PM |
| |
|
fight the future
Master of my domain.
Member since 3/10 2067 total posts
Name:
Rebecca
|
Re: Child's body found at Gilgo Beach
|
| Posted 4/11/11 2:29 PM |
| |
|
Aries14
Can't plan life...
Member since 8/08 2860 total posts
Name:
|
Re: Child's body found at Gilgo Beach
Posted by Lina
Posted by Ayne11
I just read on Newsday they were animal remains, and not that of an infant.
Thank God! Why would they even write something so horrible if its false information. How would they even mistake animal bones for human. I know the average person might not be able to tell but I'm sure if they had anyone there that knows something about human anatomy they would be able to tell the difference. Even if you only had parts of the skeleton you should still be able to tell. Just glad it wasn't a child, I am so sick of hearing about all of these bodies... we live in such a sick world! praying there are no more bodies found
There was children remains found... the Newsday title is misleading...
|
| Posted 4/11/11 2:30 PM |
| |
|
DrMeg
Back home!
Member since 5/08 1858 total posts
Name:
Meg
|
Re: Child's body found at Gilgo Beach
I saw someone reading the Metro this morning on the bus and saw this headline as well.
|
| Posted 4/11/11 2:31 PM |
| |
|
Cacarina
Two girls!
Member since 12/09 2971 total posts
Name:
Cari
|
Re: Child's body found at Gilgo Beach
Posted by Lina
Posted by Ayne11
I just read on Newsday they were animal remains, and not that of an infant.
Thank God! Why would they even write something so horrible if its false information. How would they even mistake animal bones for human. I know the average person might not be able to tell but I'm sure if they had anyone there that knows something about human anatomy they would be able to tell the difference. Even if you only had parts of the skeleton you should still be able to tell. Just glad it wasn't a child, I am so sick of hearing about all of these bodies... we live in such a sick world! praying there are no more bodies found
Not sure if it is false information or not, but if you read the Newsday article thoroughly, no where in that article does it say that the animal bones were mistaken as infant bones. I believe the "infant" bones were found days ago and the animal bones were found this morning.
|
| Posted 4/11/11 2:32 PM |
| |
|
krwm
<3
Member since 7/05 3466 total posts
Name:
|
Re: Child's body found at Gilgo Beach
according to the NYPost a "law enforcement source" stated that the remains of a child were found last week in the second group of remains that have yet to be identified. this is so sad and terrible....
In addition the following is on News12 as of 2:01pm:
Remains found at Jones Beach; not yet known if human
(04/11/11) JONES BEACH - Police announced during a news conference this afternoon that remains were found 1.5 miles east of the Jones Beach water tower on the north side.
Officials say it has not yet been determined if they are human or animal remains. The medical examiner is expected to make the determination soon.
Message edited 4/11/2011 2:37:14 PM.
|
| Posted 4/11/11 2:34 PM |
| |
|
Lina
My angel is finally here
Member since 5/10 2559 total posts
Name:
Lindsay
|
Re: Child's body found at Gilgo Beach
Posted by Aries14
Posted by Lina
Posted by Ayne11
I just read on Newsday they were animal remains, and not that of an infant.
Thank God! Why would they even write something so horrible if its false information. How would they even mistake animal bones for human. I know the average person might not be able to tell but I'm sure if they had anyone there that knows something about human anatomy they would be able to tell the difference. Even if you only had parts of the skeleton you should still be able to tell. Just glad it wasn't a child, I am so sick of hearing about all of these bodies... we live in such a sick world! praying there are no more bodies found
There was children remains found... the Newsday title is misleading...
Oh no! That is terrible. So sad 
|
| Posted 4/11/11 2:36 PM |
| |
|
Ayne11
Yep
Member since 1/09 18021 total posts
Name:
|
Re: Child's body found at Gilgo Beach
This is why I hate Newsday.  Sorry for post inaccurately.
|
| Posted 4/11/11 2:47 PM |
| |
|
Finally1108
My two boys
Member since 12/08 3541 total posts
Name:
Angela
|
Re: Child's body found at Gilgo Beach
i can not believe what is going on at Gilgo... it is all so heartbreaking
|
| Posted 4/11/11 2:49 PM |
| |
|
DancinBarefoot
06ers Rock!!
Member since 1/07 9534 total posts
Name:
The One My Mother Gave Me ;-)
|
Re: Child's body found at Gilgo Beach
Posted by ChrisDee
Posted by browneyes
Posted by Ayne11
I just read on Newsday they were animal remains, and not that of an infant.
oh thankgoodness!
I hope that I am wrong but I believe that they found animal bones in ADDITION to the child. The child was found days ago actually so I would think by now that they have figured out if it is a child or not. AGAIN, I pray that I am wrong.
The article I read said they found remains TODAY (Monday, April 11) and could not determine at the scene whether or not they were animal or human remains. Of the 4 unidentified bodies they have, ONE, is a child. ETA: If I had to guess, I would think, the single body they found is the chilld, and the three others they found "together" are adults. Although the cops aren't saying, the 3 they found "together" are probably linked to the first 4.
Message edited 4/11/2011 2:53:41 PM.
|
| Posted 4/11/11 2:52 PM |
| |
|
Ayne11
Yep
Member since 1/09 18021 total posts
Name:
|
Re: Child's body found at Gilgo Beach
Posted by DancinBarefoot
Posted by ChrisDee
Posted by browneyes
Posted by Ayne11
I just read on Newsday they were animal remains, and not that of an infant.
oh thankgoodness!
I hope that I am wrong but I believe that they found animal bones in ADDITION to the child. The child was found days ago actually so I would think by now that they have figured out if it is a child or not. AGAIN, I pray that I am wrong.
The article I read said they found remains TODAY (Monday, April 11) and could not determine at the scene whether or not they were animal or human remains. Of the 4 unidentified bodies they have, ONE, is a child. ETA: If I had to guess, I would think, the single body they found is the chilld, and the three others they found "together" are adults. Although the cops aren't saying, the 3 they found "together" are probably linked to the first 4.
Yikes! Newsday just updated their story to reflect all of this information.
this is so horrible! I wonder how long those bramble bushes have been used as a dumping ground by either car or by boat.
Message edited 4/11/2011 3:04:34 PM.
|
| Posted 4/11/11 3:04 PM |
| |
|
sweetie101
you make me smile :o)
Member since 5/08 4419 total posts
Name:
|
Re: Child's body found at Gilgo Beach
|
| Posted 4/11/11 3:07 PM |
| |
|
Mom2010
LIF Toddler
Member since 3/10 384 total posts
Name:
Eclaire Lover
|
Re: Child's body found at Gilgo Beach
There was a young girl living in a halfway house in Merrick with her infant child. She's been missing since August..
|
| Posted 4/11/11 3:34 PM |
| |
|
jam11308
Member since 11/07 7273 total posts
Name:
|
Re: Child's body found at Gilgo Beach
Posted by Mom2010
There was a young girl living in a halfway house in Merrick with her infant child. She's been missing since August..
|
| Posted 4/11/11 3:56 PM |
| |
|
| Pages: [1] 2 |
