LIFamilies.com - Long Island, NY


RSS
Articles Business Directory Blog Real Estate Community Forum Shop My Family Contests

Log In Chat Index Search Rules Lingo Create Account

Quick navigation:   

You must be a logged in user to report a bad post!

I would

Forum Opinion Poll
do it 11 23.40%
not do it 35 74.47%
other 1 2.13%
 

Would you do an external version?

Posted By Message

DiamondGirl
You are my I love you

Member since 7/09

18802 total posts

Name:
DiamondMama

Would you do an external version?

Baby was breech at33w5d. I go back 35w1d to check if baby has turned. Obviously I have time but I am trying to make the most informed decision, if baby does not turn would you do external version? why ? thanks for your input

Message edited 8/6/2014 7:34:18 AM.

Posted 8/6/14 7:33 AM
 

Ellynrose
LIF Adult

Member since 10/11

1714 total posts

Name:

Would you do an external version?

I personally opted not to do it

1. There was a slim chance dd was going to flip
2. It doesn't guarantee that dc will stay flipped
3. I've heard it hurts like a *****
4. It could end up in an emergency section

Really, it is a personal choice. Having a schedule section made me feel in control of a situation I could not control.

Posted 8/6/14 7:40 AM
 

BeachGrl
LIF Adult

Member since 10/11

2140 total posts

Name:
Kristy

Would you do an external version?

Yes I had one in June at 37 weeks and it worked. Baby stayed head down the rest of the time. I had a non complicated vaginal birth at 40 weeks. You can read my story if you search my past posts. I would do it again in a second

Posted 8/6/14 8:43 AM
 

nferrandi
too excited for words

Member since 10/05

18538 total posts

Name:
Nicole

Re: Would you do an external version?

I would say no. But that's just based on a friends experience. She said it was the most painful thing ever and it didn't even work.

Posted 8/6/14 8:47 AM
 

BaysideForever
LIF Adult

Member since 1/11

9976 total posts

Name:

Re: Would you do an external version?

I had an external version. At the time, I did not regret it because I was willing to do everything i possibly could to avoid a c-section. It didn't work. But even if it did work, I doubt my opinion on the matter would have changed. Not to scare you but it was the worst part of my entire pregnancy, including my c-section. C-section was a piece of cake compared to the version. It hurt (and my doctor was mean but that's not important) Overall, it was just a painful experience physically and emotionally. I told myself I would never do it again and that I would discourage others from doing it.

Posted 8/6/14 9:19 AM
 

oneday
<3

Member since 5/05

4319 total posts

Name:
Pam

Re: Would you do an external version?

I would say if it's important to you - try it. Though I think you could probably wait a little longer in case the baby turns on its own.

I've posted before that I did try for a version. I had complete trust in my doctor and he was very highly recommended for this procedure - all the other docs at my practice said if I wanted to try, he was the guy to do it - and he had an above average track record.

I won't lie - it was not a pleasant experience. It was a LOT of pressure and I had to lay flat which by that point was so uncomfortable for me - I felt a bit like I was being suffocated. But, it was only maybe 10-20 mins. The Dr. told me he would try 3 times and if it didn't work, I was SOL. I was also completely monitored the whole time by sonogram and the fetal monitor so if baby was in any distress, he would have stopped.

He turned the baby all the way around on the third try. And DS promptly turned himself back.Chat Icon So it was all for naught - but that being said, I do not regret in any way my attempt. I REALLY did not want a repeat CSection. I REALLY wanted a VBAC. But, baby had other ideas.
In the end DS was born perfectly healthy (and with a beautiful round head Chat Icon )

And, just to mention, DS#1 was also breech, so I am assuming that the way my insides are, that's how a baby fits best. I'd be willing to bet if I had another, it would be breech too.

Posted 8/6/14 9:26 AM
 

Pomegranate5
LIF Adult

Member since 2/11

4798 total posts

Name:
Pomegranate5

Re: Would you do an external version?

Posted by nferrandi

I would say no. But that's just based on a friends experience. She said it was the most painful thing ever and it didn't even work.



This. And it broke my friends water and sent her immediately into labor so she had to have an emergency c-section.

Also, I know there are chiropractic techniques that have good success rates. I personally would try that route first.

Posted 8/6/14 9:39 AM
 

SLPRunner
LIF Adult

Member since 12/13

1101 total posts

Name:

Re: Would you do an external version?

I decided not to have one. Turns out my fluid was a little low towards the end so I would not have been a good candidate anyway. I went to a chiropractor twice a week from 32 weeks on for the Webster technique and DS did not turn. I had a planned c-section at 39 weeks. I wasn't happy because I was planning for a natural birth, but the recovery was relatively easy and it all worked out in the end.

Posted 8/6/14 10:24 AM
 

NYCGirl80
I love my kiddies!

Member since 5/11

10413 total posts

Name:

Re: Would you do an external version?

For me, I would never do it. I've told this story so many times on this board, but...DS was breech and I was given the option of having a version. Something told me that if he didn't turn on his own, there was a reason, and just to let things be. I wound up going into labor before my scheduled c-section and we found out the cord was wrapped tightly 3 times around DS's neck. The version literally could have killed him. So no, it's not worth the risk to me.

Posted 8/6/14 12:04 PM
 

MrsA1012
love my little girl !

Member since 9/10

5777 total posts

Name:
Me

Re: Would you do an external version?

http://evidencebasedbirth.com/what-is-the-evidence-for-using-an-external-cephalic-version-to-turn-a-breech-baby/

This is great website that analyzes all the current research on different birth topics. I'd take a look.

Also, please know that a baby being breech should NOT mean an immediate c-section. Google ACOG's opinion from 2006, Mode of term singleton breech delivery. There are certain guidelines that doctors have put forth that will allow women who are good candidates to do a "trial of labor". Take a look.
http://sogc.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/gui226CPG0906.pdf

Message edited 8/6/2014 12:55:50 PM.

Posted 8/6/14 12:40 PM
 

LiveItUp
Love my babies!

Member since 8/11

4096 total posts

Name:

Would you do an external version?

I tried it and it didn't work but i don't regret trying bc I was very much hoping to avoid the csection. I was nervous about, but I trusted my doctor (and he had even performed an external version on his own wife) so I knew he felt confortable doing it and would know when to stop so he wouldn't hurt the baby. It was painful and I was sore the next day, but I don't feel like it was that bad. It was over in just a few minutes.

Posted 8/6/14 1:02 PM
 

DiamondGirl
You are my I love you

Member since 7/09

18802 total posts

Name:
DiamondMama

Would you do an external version?

Thanks girls. I don't want a section but better I suffer through surgery then I potentially harm my baby so I think I wont do it.

Posted 8/6/14 1:53 PM
 

wingsofsong
My 3 little loves <3<3<3

Member since 1/09

7395 total posts

Name:
Maureen

Would you do an external version?

I faced this a potential option. I did a lot of research on it and talked to a lot of people about it. Ultimately, I decided I would do it as a last resort. I decided to try all home remedies/yoga positions/tricks that I could, then my next thing would have been to try accupuncture, and version would have come after that. As I stated on your other thread, my girl turned on her own, so I didn't get to that point. Talk to your OB about any concerns you have. The way mine explained it was this: "Either it will be easy or it won't work. And I would know within minutes if it wasn't going to work, in which case I would not continue." I trust my doctor tremendously and this made a lot of sense to me and really made me feel more comfortable about the whole thing.

Posted 8/6/14 9:45 PM
 

Waste06
Waste not, want not

Member since 6/06

7219 total posts

Name:
Lois Mom Mommy Mama Ma

Re: Would you do an external version?

My child was breech, and I did not do it. Wouldn't consider it for my second pregnancy either.

Posted 8/7/14 10:32 AM
 
 

Potentially Related Topics:

Topic Posted By Started Replies Forum
Has anyone had an external version done to turn a breech baby? wingsofsong 3/28/14 21 Parenting
xpost: External version? BTDT moms any advice? diggity10 6/30/10 4 Parenting
Breech Baby/External Cephalic Version- Anyone have this done? DC HJJ M 3/5/08 13 Pregnancy
manually turning baby-external cephalic version... newday21608 7/10/08 21 Pregnancy
I had an external version today,no luck robin 10/17/07 4 Pregnancy
external version robin 10/14/07 4 Pregnancy
 
Quick navigation:   
Currently 483605 users on the LIFamilies.com Chat
New Businesses
1 More Rep
Carleton Hall of East Islip
J&A Building Services
LaraMae Health Coaching
Sonic Wellness
Julbaby Photography LLC
Ideal Uniforms
Teresa Geraghty Photography
Camelot Dream Homes
Long Island Wedding Boutique
MB Febus- Rodan & Fields
Camp Harbor
Market America-Shop.com
ACM Basement Waterproofing
Travel Tom

      Follow LIWeddings on Facebook

      Follow LIFamilies on Twitter
Long Island Bridal Shows