|
You must first be logged in to post a new topic.
If you are not registered, please click "Create Account".
Smallest possible footprint for a full bath?
| Posted By |
Message |
Tfor3
LIF Infant
Member since 9/06 291 total posts
Name:
|
Smallest possible footprint for a full bath?
I'm thinking of relocating a full bath in my house but the area I would relocate it to is kind of small. I want to keep it a full bath with a tub. Does anyone know the minimum dimensions I need to plan on for a basic full bath?
Thanks so much!
|
Posted 6/3/09 1:33 PM  |
| |
|
Long Island Weddings
Long Island's Largest Bridal Resource | Prudential Douglas Elliman Real Estate |
LeShellem
A new beginning
Member since 2/07 3600 total posts
Name:
LeShelle
|
Re: Smallest possible footprint for a full bath?
a 5'x 8' would be my smallest. You can go slightly smaller from the 8' but it does get incredibly tight. You wont be able to go smaller than 5' across.
|
| Posted 6/3/09 1:46 PM |
| |
|
Tfor3
LIF Infant
Member since 9/06 291 total posts
Name:
|
Re: Smallest possible footprint for a full bath?
Great - that's so helpful. Thanks!
|
| Posted 6/3/09 1:48 PM |
| |
|
Elbee
Zanzibar
Member since 5/05 10767 total posts
Name:
Me
|
Re: Smallest possible footprint for a full bath?
a standard bathtub is 60", so 5' wide
(you can buy one as small as 4-1/2 feet I believe though)
Google compact toilets and then a pedestal sink
You could probably get away with 6x5 if you really needed to, but it would be really tight ...
Message edited 6/3/2009 1:50:15 PM.
|
| Posted 6/3/09 1:49 PM |
| |
|
imyself
Member since 10/06 2938 total posts
Name:
me
|
Re: Smallest possible footprint for a full bath?
for a bathroom with a tub, toilet and 24" sink (small sink) I would go no smaller then 5'-0" x 7'-6".
|
| Posted 6/3/09 1:51 PM |
| |
|
Potentially Related Topics:
Currently 744642 users on the LIFamilies.com Chat
|
