| Posted By |
Message |
bigfathuh
LIF Zygote
Member since 3/11 10 total posts
Name:
|
Continued "huh" leaning toward chemical
Beta came back at a 10 from the equivalent of 14 DPO.
|
Posted 3/21/11 4:59 PM  |
| |
|
Long Island Weddings
Long Island's Largest Bridal Resource |
kelsept
LIF Adolescent
Member since 12/07 833 total posts
Name:
Kelley
|
Re: Continued "huh" leaning toward chemical
Have you gotten AF? So sorry.
|
| Posted 3/21/11 7:54 PM |
| |
|
MrsG72907
Mommy of 2 girls!
Member since 5/10 2046 total posts
Name:
|
Re: Continued "huh" leaning toward chemical
are you going to go for a repeat?? sometimes some people just have very low numbers. 
|
| Posted 3/21/11 8:22 PM |
| |
|
prunepie
LIF Adult
Member since 7/06 4357 total posts
Name:
jennifer
|
Re: Continued "huh" leaning toward chemical
i had a beta of 8 at 13 dpo.
i did have a loss at 9 weeks but that was for other issues.
gl!!!!!!
|
| Posted 3/21/11 8:44 PM |
| |
|
bigfathuh
LIF Zygote
Member since 3/11 10 total posts
Name:
|
Re: Continued "huh" leaning toward chemical
kelsept - No I have not gotten AF. I am on progesterone.
MrsG72907 - I am going for a repeat beta today (equivalent to 16 DPO)
prunepie - Thank you for sharing that with me. I hope that my numbers are just very low, but I am discouraged and upset because I do not think it will work out.
|
| Posted 3/22/11 6:26 AM |
| |
|
nicknmb
SISTERS!
Member since 1/06 5193 total posts
Name:
MaryBeth
|
Re: Continued "huh" leaning toward chemical
Yes, a 10 is low, but from experience, I have learned that it's really not the first number that matters....it's the 2nd! for a nice big jump for you!!!!
|
| Posted 3/22/11 8:44 AM |
| |
|
Pomegranate5
LIF Adult
Member since 2/11 4798 total posts
Name:
Pomegranate5
|
Re: Continued "huh" leaning toward chemical
|
| Posted 3/22/11 10:40 AM |
| |
|
curiousO
he is here.. thank you God
Member since 10/07 2344 total posts
Name:
Me
|
Re: Continued "huh" leaning toward chemical
i had beta of 5.3 at 14 dpo. then the number rose nicely. but i m/c at 7 weeks
however, it is not the number itself, it is the rate of doubling that matters. GL!
|
| Posted 3/22/11 10:43 AM |
| |
|
mcl916
my two loves
Member since 10/06 5133 total posts
Name:
Megan
|
Re: Continued "huh" leaning toward chemical
Mine was 25 at 14dpo and now I'm 16 weeks... they all have to start somewhere. AND I had 2 chemicals before this one and this was the lowest beta so I was sure this was another chemical- I was shocked when 4 days later my beta was up to 325!!
I hope your numbers today are much better, beta hell is the worst 
|
| Posted 3/22/11 1:01 PM |
| |
|
|
|
Re: Continued "huh" leaning toward chemical
Good luck! Keep us posted on the 2nd beta!
|
| Posted 3/22/11 4:53 PM |
| |
|
keepingsecrets
ridiculously blessed!!
Member since 7/09 1912 total posts
Name:
|
Re: Continued "huh" leaning toward chemical
sending you lots of and
|
| Posted 3/22/11 4:56 PM |
| |
|
RGEC47
Feeling blessed!
Member since 11/09 3039 total posts
Name:
Rosa
|
Re: Continued "huh" leaning toward chemical
Hope you get good news with Beta#2.
|
| Posted 3/22/11 4:57 PM |
| |
|
MCD0524
LIF Adult
Member since 4/10 1199 total posts
Name:
|
Re: Continued "huh" leaning toward chemical
I just wanted to add in with the positive vibes. My sister's best friend went to the hospital because she was feeling really weird, terrible breathing pains etc and they did blood work while there. They were TTC'ing. The Dr came in and said well your HCG level is 5 which technically means your pregnant but the level is so low we don't know what DPO you are and if this is viable.
Well, I just attended her baby shower on Saturday (she is due in 3 weeks). So have hope and I will be praying for you :)
|
| Posted 3/22/11 7:05 PM |
| |
|
