You must first be logged in to post a new topic.
If you are not registered, please click "Create Account".
| Posted By |
Message |
| Pages: 1 [2] 3 |
SweetestOfPeas
J'taime Paris!
Member since 3/06 32345 total posts
Name:
|
Re: Is this shot too risky for a Children's Swimsuit Ad?
the first pictures is HIGHLY inappropriate IMO 
ETA: OMG! I just noticed that in the 2nd pic, she's wearing low rise bikini bottoms!   OMG! she's just a baby! 
Message edited 9/20/2006 6:35:49 PM.
|
Posted 9/20/06 6:34 PM  |
| |
|
Long Island Weddings
Long Island's Largest Bridal Resource |
megsm3
Life is Good!!
Member since 8/06 3867 total posts
Name:
M
|
Re: Is this shot too risky for a Children's Swimsuit Ad?
topless ad of a 5 year old - yes it is too much!! she is absolutely adorable though and the other shots are great!
|
| Posted 9/20/06 6:55 PM |
| |
|
mrswask
Pookie Love
Member since 5/05 20229 total posts
Name:
Michal
|
Re: Is this shot too risky for a Children's Swimsuit Ad?
Really disturbing and incredibly inappropriate!!!
|
| Posted 9/20/06 7:45 PM |
| |
|
randella
Love my little man
Member since 8/05 16290 total posts
Name:
Randi
|
Re: Is this shot too risky for a Children's Swimsuit Ad?
I think little girls sometimes don't wear their tops-- I mean, look at the Coppertone girl (aka Jody Foster). That has been a branding icon for years.
|
| Posted 9/20/06 9:01 PM |
| |
|
johnsae
Sip.
Member since 3/06 18677 total posts
Name:
|
Re: Is this shot too risky for a Children's Swimsuit Ad?
of course I just asked DH...if we had a daughter, would you let her pose like this?
he was like..."yeah, why not...little kids run around naked all the time." MEN!!!!! So dumb. 
|
| Posted 9/20/06 9:04 PM |
| |
|
MelToddJulia
Love my Family!
Member since 7/05 29064 total posts
Name:
Mel
|
Re: Is this shot too risky for a Children's Swimsuit Ad?
No I dont think it is, her daughter is beautiful!
|
| Posted 9/20/06 9:16 PM |
| |
|
nrthshgrl
It goes fast. Pay attention.
Member since 7/05 57538 total posts
Name:
|
Re: Is this shot too risky for a Children's Swimsuit Ad?
I could see it being a cute picture if I thought I was looking at that picture of MY kid.
The thought that some creepy guy is going to get ANOTHER idea of it? Forget it!
|
| Posted 9/20/06 9:34 PM |
| |
|
Jesaroo
is not the girl you knew
Member since 5/05 14266 total posts
Name:
Jes
|
Re: Is this shot too risky for a Children's Swimsuit Ad?
i think the only thing inappropriate it the temp tattoo on her lower back. that are of the body for a tat is considered a sexy spot so i def dont feel it is appropriate for a 5 yr old.
the topless part i think is innocent. theres nothing wrong imo for an innocent child to be topless... they are alowed to run around in just their undies.... at least in my opinion
eta: i just noticed ppl are thinking the 2nd is inappropraite as well???  i see absolutely nothing wrong with 2 little girls hugging!
Message edited 9/20/2006 9:47:19 PM.
|
| Posted 9/20/06 9:43 PM |
| |
|
SweetestOfPeas
J'taime Paris!
Member since 3/06 32345 total posts
Name:
|
Re: Is this shot too risky for a Children's Swimsuit Ad?
Posted by Lolita4Life
eta: i just noticed ppl are thinking the 2nd is inappropraite as well??? i see absolutely nothing wrong with 2 little girls hugging!
the only reason I don't like the 2nd pic is b/c she's wearing low rise bikini bottoms (just like the tat, it's a sexy thing - IMO). you can see her hip bone. she's just a baby. 
otherwise, it is adorable - the 2 girls hugging
Message edited 9/21/2006 7:21:03 AM.
|
| Posted 9/21/06 7:20 AM |
| |
|
skip123
Trying...
Member since 8/06 2759 total posts
Name:
|
Re: Is this shot too risky for a Children's Swimsuit Ad?
Oh yea..that first one is way too much....the fake tattoo is what did it...shes only 5..
|
| Posted 9/21/06 7:27 AM |
| |
|
Faithx2
All good things in 2016!!
Member since 8/05 20181 total posts
Name:
|
Re: Is this shot too risky for a Children's Swimsuit Ad?
I don't like the first pic. Too much, too little! She looks alot like her mommy!
|
| Posted 9/21/06 7:51 AM |
| |
|
Wendy
Wheeee!
Member since 5/05 13736 total posts
Name:
|
Re: Is this shot too risky for a Children's Swimsuit Ad?
Posted by randella
I think little girls sometimes don't wear their tops-- I mean, look at the Coppertone girl (aka Jody Foster). That has been a branding icon for years.
This is what I was going to say. There are probably no pictures of me in my childhood photo albums with a top on!!
But I do think the suggestive pose in that picture (and how low riding the bottoms are, and the fake tat) are pretty disgusting for a child.
|
| Posted 9/21/06 9:34 AM |
| |
|
jozieb0925
Double Trouble!
Member since 5/05 4358 total posts
Name:
Josie
|
Re: Is this shot too risky for a Children's Swimsuit Ad?
OMG..that first picture is just not right. I can't believe CC would allow that...and can't believe she has a fake tattoo on her back..I am just SHOCKED at this..
The other two are fine...
|
| Posted 9/21/06 9:39 AM |
| |
|
Jagster2000
LIF Adult
Member since 8/06 934 total posts
Name:
Me & My Sis back in the day!~~Jennifer
|
Re: Is this shot too risky for a Children's Swimsuit Ad?
Posted by tray831
Maybe she didnt follow the Jon Benet case. Little Children ESPECIALLY GIRLS SHOULD NOT BE EXPLOITED LIKE THIS!!!
Topless A lower back tat? And she is 5!!???? And then they wonder why their children have done so much & have gotten in so much trouble before their 18! They get pushed to be little adults at such a young age!!!!!
|
| Posted 9/21/06 10:38 AM |
| |
|
Mrs-Beans
LIF Adolescent
Member since 7/06 812 total posts
Name:
|
Re: Is this shot too risky for a Children's Swimsuit Ad?
Posted by Colleen9304
Totally inappropriate - I would even go so far as to say the 2nd one is too. There is no reason to make a 5 y/o appear sexy by going topless witha lower back "tattoo".
As if the pedophiles need more fodder for their perversions.
100% agree...she is a beutiful little girl.
|
| Posted 9/21/06 10:51 AM |
| |
|
CaseyGirl
Mommy to 3 Boys :)
Member since 5/05 19978 total posts
Name:
Jen - counting my blessings...
|
Re: Is this shot too risky for a Children's Swimsuit Ad?
It's a little extreme but I guess some people call that "art".
She looks so much like her mom!
|
| Posted 9/21/06 6:23 PM |
| |
|
salumunz
Chloe
Member since 1/06 1554 total posts
Name:
Patty
|
Re: Is this shot too risky for a Children's Swimsuit Ad?
I think the first one is totally innapropriate, and I honestly dont think the second one is much better. Bizarre.
|
| Posted 9/21/06 10:39 PM |
| |
|
Jenziba
?
Member since 5/05 6265 total posts
Name:
Jennifer
|
Re: Is this shot too risky for a Children's Swimsuit Ad?
I honestly don't think that first shot is all that inappropriate. The tatoo...YES!
What I do think is inappropriate is all the disgusting perverted people out there who will be jacking off to this or whatever other crazy sh$t they do...because of them a beautiful shot like that pic is is now labeled RISKY...
|
| Posted 9/21/06 11:05 PM |
| |
|
beachgirl13
Mommy to 3 boys!
Member since 5/05 4114 total posts
Name:
|
Re: Is this shot too risky for a Children's Swimsuit Ad?
not digging a back tattoo on a 5 year old!
|
| Posted 9/21/06 11:11 PM |
| |
|
MrsQ
Just me
Member since 6/06 11378 total posts
Name:
Qiana
|
Re: Is this shot too risky for a Children's Swimsuit Ad?
Is Cindy Crawford's daughter, Kaya, way too young to be following in the footsteps of her supermodel mom - especially in suggestive photos that advertise beachwear?
Could be.
Trendy Melissa Odabash beachwear - which has outfitted celebs such as Britney Spears, Uma Thurman and Pamela Anderson - yesterday announced it will pull pics of Kaya from its Web site.
One shows the 5-year-old daughter of Crawford and nightclub owner Rande Gerber posing topless, peeking over her left shoulder at the camera, with white shorts with a lower-back tattoo. Others show her in a string bikini.
"We've gotten calls from all over the place - from 'Access Hollywood,' all over the place," corporate flack Roberta Correia told Lowdown.
"Unfortunately, we are not able to release any of the pictures or info on the Melissa Odabash shoot," she added in an E-mail. "The pictures are actually no longer going to be on the Web site."
Asked why not, Correia didn't respond.
The Kaya photos have provoked a storm of criticism in recent days. "The tattoo, whether real or not, is the first thing that bothers me," one critic wrote on www.babyrazzi.com, a blog about celebrity baby pictures. "It is for sure an adult pose. Yes, JonBenet comes to mind."
Another critic wrote: "The topless one with the back tattoo and the provocative pose borders on kiddie porn. The child is cute and makes an excellent model, but the poses and the swimsuits are far too sexualized for children. Shame on you, Cindy, to let your 5-year-old baby participate in this."
But on a different blog, the over-the-shoulder photo received praise. "I find the picture to be sweet and in good taste," wrote a defender.
"The tattoo look like a temp, which all kids love to put on and take off in a few days."
Crawford's PR rep initially laughed off the criticism. "Oh my God, that's ridiculous," she said yesterday. "It's a stick-on tattoo!"
Asked for a comment from Kaya's parents, the flack said: "Cindy's friends own this company. It was just a fun little photo shoot they did in Malibu one day. Kaya is not modeling."
|
| Posted 9/22/06 9:42 AM |
| |
|
|
|
Re: Is this shot too risky for a Children's Swimsuit Ad?
ugh thats disturbing.
|
| Posted 9/22/06 10:00 AM |
| |
|
~Colleen~
my loves...
Member since 5/05 9129 total posts
Name:
guess
|
Re: Is this shot too risky for a Children's Swimsuit Ad?
Posted by Wendy
Posted by randella
I think little girls sometimes don't wear their tops-- I mean, look at the Coppertone girl (aka Jody Foster). That has been a branding icon for years.
This is what I was going to say. There are probably no pictures of me in my childhood photo albums with a top on!!
But I do think the suggestive pose in that picture (and how low riding the bottoms are, and the fake tat) are pretty disgusting for a child.
I don't think the being topless part is an issue (for me, at least) it's the suggestive posing - the look over the shoulder - and the lower back tat. If you open a men's magazine you could find the same pose - it's sexually suggestive and really inappropriate for a 5 year old.
I thought the second photo was as well - there's one thing photographing your kids hugging but the back arch again, suggests sexual connotations. Imo.
|
| Posted 9/22/06 10:22 AM |
| |
|
dandr10199
Grace is growing up too fast!
Member since 10/05 11561 total posts
Name:
Dina
|
Re: Is this shot too risky for a Children's Swimsuit Ad?
Posted by Shellyesq
Posted by jf1975
please please tell me this is a joke.
utterly ridiculous...what 5 yr old is going topless...I am really disgusted if this is true.
et: I didn't see the bottom 2, which are better but that top one UGH..
btw, is that a tramp stamp on her lower back
I agree. Its sick!! Why oh why would try to make a 5 year old sexy????
I agree! As a mom of a four month old, this is disgusting! Has the whole JonBenet thing taught us anything???
|
| Posted 9/22/06 12:22 PM |
| |
|
monkeybride
My Everything
Member since 5/05 20541 total posts
Name:
|
Re: Is this shot too risky for a Children's Swimsuit Ad?
I do not like the first picture at all. For an adult, sure fine whatever but that pose on a child is a bit much for me.
|
| Posted 9/22/06 5:13 PM |
| |
|
lilqtny
-Crossfit & pitbull addict
Member since 7/06 2830 total posts
Name:
Tracy
|
Re: Is this shot too risky for a Children's Swimsuit Ad?
I know I am part of a minority, but I like them. I think they are okay. As others have said, I have many topless shots of me and plenty of "modeling" shots as well (cause we all know we did it when we were little and thought we were the sh*t, lol )
|
| Posted 9/22/06 5:20 PM |
| |
|
| Pages: 1 [2] 3 |
